RentSupervisor

TWINS

A Luxury Early-Childhood Campus
North Miami · Florida
Raising $4M for 30% · funding construction of a fully-permitted project
Scroll ↓
The Opportunity

A premium gap,
hiding in plain sight.

North Miami families pay top-of-market prices for early childhood care — yet the neighborhood has no beautiful, purpose-built option. Twins fills that gap.

"The few preschools here charge ~$2,500 a month — and are horrible to look at." — the local reality Twins is built to replace
The Market

Expensive, supply-starved, underserved.

Miami has some of the highest childcare costs in Florida — and quality, purpose-built capacity is scarce, especially in this micro-market.

Miami preschool avg ~$1,083/mo
Infant care ~$1,250/mo (highest in FL)
Private / elite $14K–$54K/yr
Local incumbents ~$2,500/mo

The incumbents

  • ~$2,500 / month
  • Visually poor, dated facilities
  • No pools, no swim program
  • Generic programming
  • Parents pay premium for sub-premium

Twins

  • At / above market — for a superior product
  • Two twin luxury buildings, one campus
  • Two resort pools + structured swim program
  • Full curriculum, low ratios, chef meals
  • The only luxury option in the area
At a Glance · Target Model

Built for premium, by design.

2×5,100 ft²
Identical twin buildings, one campus
~150
Children — well within code
2
Resort pools + swim program
$0
Rent — the real estate is owned
The Vision

Two buildings. One campus.
No fence between them.

Mirror-image luxury architecture merged into a single gated campus — generous space, light, glass, and landscaped grounds designed around children.

Illuminated exterior and pool

Aerial shows both twin buildings (to be unified into one fence-free campus); night renders from the project design.

"The most beautiful place to grow up in North Miami."
The Film

See the architecture in motion.

Exterior walkthrough of the project design.

The Experience

More than a preschool.

🏊

Swim & Wellness

Two on-site pools power a structured water-confidence program — a rare, high-value differentiator at this age tier.

🌿

Garden Classrooms

Shaded play, soft surfacing, sensory gardens and outdoor learning patios across a unified, secure campus.

📚

Full Curriculum

Infant through Pre-K / VPK — language, music, STEM-play and art, low ratios, chef-prepared meals.

Programs & Capacity

Five age bands. Room to spare.

The 10,200 ft² campus is well above what code requires — at 35 ft²/child it supports 180+ children. Twins targets ~150 at a generous, low-density premium feel.

ProgramAgesFL ratioChildrenTeachers
Infant0–1 yr1 : 4185
Toddler1–2 yr1 : 6244
Twos2–3 yr1 : 11303
Preschool3–4 yr1 : 15363
Pre-K / VPK4–5 yr1 : 20423
Total150~18
Licensing & Funding

Designed to code — and to capture VPK.

Operated under Florida DCF child-care licensing, with the facility designed to standards from day one — plus access to state pre-K funding.

Indoor ≥35 ft²/child
Outdoor ≥45 ft²/child
FL DCF ratios & screening
VPK funds 4-yr-olds ~$3,029/child
Wrap-around tuition on top of VPK
Premium tuition. Owned land. No rent.
The Economics · Target Stabilized

~$4.5M revenue. Under $1M cost.

Premium pricing in a supply-starved market — amplified by owning the land, so the "rent savings" reinvest into staff and experience.

Revenue driverCalculationAmount
Base tuition150 × $2,500 / mo$375,000 / mo
Annualized$375,000 × 12$4,500,000 / yr
Enrichment & programsswim, classes, camp, meals+$300–500K
Gross revenue~$4.5–5.0M

Owner-operated case

~$3.5M
EBITDA (~78%) · opex < $1.0M · no rent

Conservative case

~$2.9M
EBITDA (~64%) · full market-wage staffing (~$1.6M opex)

Net planning figure ≈ $3.0M/yr. Margins beat the 10–25% childcare norm because the land is owned (no rent) and pricing is premium. Estimates pending confirmed build budget & pricing.

Valuation

What it's worth, once built.

On ~$3.0M net profit, education businesses trade at 4–6× earnings — and this one is real-estate-backed and high-margin.

$12M
at 4× (conservative)
$15M
at 5× (base)
$18M
at 6× (premium)
+RE
owned real estate as asset backing
The Platform

Two years of de-risking — already done.

This is no longer a lot. It is an entitled, designed, permit-ready development platform. The hard, slow part is finished.

✓ Done

Lot subdivision

Two parcels created (15207 & 15201 NE 8th Ave).

✓ Done

Demolition & violation clearance

Site cleared; all code violations resolved.

✓ Done

Architecture & concept

Full plans completed and paid; luxury campus concept defined.

◑ Final approval

Permits

In final approval — construction-ready.

Vertical construction

Build both buildings, two pools, grounds & FF&E.

License, hire & phased open

DCF + VPK approval, staffing, pre-marketing, open Building A then B.

The Offer

30% for $4M —
funding the build.

The investor's capital funds only construction — the lowest-risk phase. The entitlement and design risk is already absorbed.

$4.0M
Raise · for 30% equity
$13.3M
Post-money valuation
~22.5%
Investor annual cash yield
~4.5 yr
Payback from distributions
Investor stake30% for $4.0M
Annual cash flow (30% × $3.0M net)~$900K / yr
Value of the 30% at stabilization (4–6×)$3.6M – $5.4M
Pre-money value (entitled platform)~$9.3M
Principal retains70% · ~$2.1M/yr

Entry at ~4.4× projected earnings — a discount to a built business's 5–6×, earned by funding construction. The principal funds the entire build with outside capital and keeps 70% (~$10.5M at 5×).

Risk & Mitigation

Eyes open, downside managed.

RiskMitigation
Construction cost overrunFixed-price GC contract; contingency in budget
Slow enrollment rampPre-marketing, waitlist, phased open, intro pricing
Staffing qualityAbove-market pay funded by the no-rent advantage
Liability / child safetyStrong insurance, training, security, pool protocols
Regulatory (DCF / VPK)Designed to code from day one; experienced director
Project "Twins"

$4M builds it. The investor earns ~22.5% a year.

A fully-permitted, premium product in an underserved market — on land already owned, two years de-risked.

✉ Contact · rentsupervisor@gmail.com

Serious inquiries only — each will be reviewed personally.